introduction | history | chronology | documents | guide home
Clackamas County U.S. District Court case file - Enlarge image | Page 2
Defendants Request, Whitman Massacre Trial, 1851
Transcript of original document:
The United States }
vs }
Telokite et al }
Telokite one of the defendants makes oath that a certain
Indian named Quishem now in the Cayuse country he thinks
will be a material witness for the defendants in this case.
That the materiality of said witness was not known in time
to have him in attendance at this term of the court. He
expects & believes that said witness will prove that the
late Dr Whitman administered medi-cines to may of the Cayuse
Indians and that afterwards a large number of them died,
including amongst them the wives and children of some of
these defendants. He expects further to prove by said
witness that a certain Joseph Lewis, who resided at
Waiilatpu informed these defendants a few days before the 29
November 1847 that the Cayuse Indians were dying in
consequence of poison being administered to them by the late
Marcus Whitman and he had heard Dr. Whitman say that he
would kill off all of the Cayuse Indians by the coming of
the ensuing spring-that he would then have their horses and
lands. Witness will also prove it is the law of the Cayuse
Indians to kill bad medicine men.
Background
The Waiilatpu mission, run by Marcus and Narcissa
Whitman and established in 1836, had become a way station
for immigrants and local Indians came to resent this. One
wagon train brought an epidemic of measles, and hundreds of
Indians died. On November 29, 1847, Cayuse Indians attacked
the mission and killed fourteen whites, including the
Whitmans. Surviving women and children were taken captive.
Hostilities ended when five Indians surrendered in 1850.
This document shows that the defendants believed that the
Whitmans poisoned the Indians so that they could take their
lands and horses. The Cayuse retribution for bad medicine
was to kill the medicine man. The five defendants were
convicted and hanged in 1851.
Words and Terms
material witness?
For Further Discussion
1. How do you think the legal status of Indians in
Oregon Territory may have affected the outcome of the
trial?
2. What was the defendant's reason for killing Marcus
Whitman?
3. Do you think the defendants would have been treated
differently in today's courts? Would the outcome of the
trial have been different?
introduction | history | chronology | documents | guide home